THE PRICE CONTROVERSY OF MINYAKITA: MEDIA, POLICY, AND PUBLIC OPINION PERSPECTIVES
Abstract
The price controversy surrounding Minyakita has remained a persistent public concern. As a subsidized cooking oil product designed to assist low-income communities, Minyakita is often unavailable at the government-set Maximum Retail Price (MRP). This situation raises significant questions about the effectiveness of distribution policies and food governance in Indonesia. Various factors, including long distribution chains and limited inter-agency coordination, serve as major obstacles to maintaining price stability and product availability in the market.
This study aims to analyze the roles of mass media, government policies, and public opinion in shaping the dynamics of the controversy. Using a qualitative approach with descriptive and case study methods, the research draws on primary data from in-depth interviews, field observations, and secondary data from news articles and policy documents.
The findings indicate that media coverage tends to be fragmented and focused on sensational aspects, reinforcing negative public perceptions of the government. The implementation of the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) policy is hindered by the lengthy distribution chain and inadequate logistics infrastructure. Additionally, the allocation of export levy funds for CPO prioritizes biodiesel subsidies over Minyakita production subsidies, leading to supply instability. Public opinion, influenced by policy inconsistencies, has eroded trust in the government, while market stability is particularly disrupted in rural areas.
The study concludes that reforms in distribution policies, optimization of producer incentives, increased transparency, and improvement in the media's role in delivering data-driven information are essential to resolving this controversy. Recommendations include optimizing distribution infrastructure, reallocating export levy funds, and developing consistent public communication strategies. This research is expected to contribute to strengthening the national food system and enhancing public trust in the government.
References
B. G. Peters, The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration (New York: Routledge, 2017)
B. Santoso, Kebijakan DMO dan Dampaknya terhadap Produksi Minyak Goreng di Indonesia (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 2022), 17(1)
B. Sulistiyanto, Kebijakan Pangan di Indonesia: Analisis Kritis (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019)
Badan Pusat Statistik, Analisis Harga Minyak Goreng di Indonesia (Jakarta: BPS, 2022)
Badan Pusat Statistik, Statistik Indeks Harga Konsumen (IHK), (Jakarta: BPS, 2022)
Chase, Foster., Jeffry, Frieden. (2017). Crisis of Trust: Socio-Economic Determinants of Europeans' Confidence in Government. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2953951
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.), (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.=, 2014)
D. L. Weimer & A. R. Vining, Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. (New York, NY: Routledge, 2010)
D. McQuail, McQuail's Mass Communication Theory (London: Sage Publications, 2010),
D. McQuail, McQuail's Mass Communication Theory (London: Sage Publications, 2010)
D.A. Scheufele, D. A., & D. Tewksbury, Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models (Journal of Communication, 2007) 57(1)
DA. Scheufele, & D. Tewksbury, Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models (Journal of Communication, 2007), 57(1)
E. Bardach, A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving (Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2011)
Fadli, Mappisabbi. (2024). Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Bureaucracy to Enhance Public Trust. 1(4):101-112. doi: 10.61132/epaperbisnis.v1i4.131
J. Widodo, Distribusi dan Tata Kelola Pangan di Indonesia (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 2018) 15(1)
Jemi, Jemi., Desiderius, Sudibyo., Rutiana, Wahyuengeseh. (2019). Challenges to accountability and transparency in implementing discretion in public services in Indonesia. 60-64. doi: 10.2991/ICONPROCS-19.2019.12
Jonathan, A., Obar., Jonathan, A., Obar., Amit, M., Schejter., Amit, M., Schejter. (2019). Distributional Data Justice: Shifting Policy to Address Digital Discrimination in Vulnerable Communities. Social Science Research Network
Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan No. 24 Tahun 2022 tentang Ketentuan Ekspor dan Impor Minyak Goreng. (Peraturan ini membahas tentang ketentuan ekspor dan impor minyak goreng, termasuk Domestic Market Obligation (DMO)).
Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan No. 50 Tahun 2022 tentang Harga Eceran Tertinggi Minyak Goreng.
Kristin, Taylor., Stephanie, Zarb., Nathan, Jeschke. (2021). Ambiguity, Uncertainty and Implementation. 3(1) doi: 10.4000/IRPP.1638
M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-Added Supply Chains (London: Pearson Education, 2016)
M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-Added Supply Chains (London: Pearson Education, 2016)
M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-Added Supply Chains (London: Pearson Education, 2016)
M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating Value-Added Supply Chains (London: Pearson Education, 2016)
Manuel, Villoria-Mendieta. (2024). Trust in government. doi: 10.1787/8672ebee-en
Marc, Raboy., David, Taras. (2004). Transparency and accountability in Canadian media policy. Communications, 29(1):59-76. doi: 10.1515/COMM.2004.006
Matthew, Grant., Meredith, Startz. (2022). Cutting Out the Middleman: The Structure of Chains of Intermediation. doi: 10.3386/w30109
Mocheudi, Martinus, Selepe. (2023). The evaluation of public policy implementation failures and possible solutions. Eureka: Social and Humanities, 43-53. doi: 10.21303/2504-5571.2023.002736
Nurlan, Issekeyev., Diana, Kazbekova. (2024). Economic Incentives as a Mechanism for Employers to Improve Working Conditions. Университет еңбектері, doi: 10.52209/1609-1825_2024_2_95
P. Kotler and K. Keller, Marketing Management. 13th Edition, (Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2008)
P., van, Aelst., Gunnar, Thesen., Stefaan, Walgrave., Rens, Vliegenthart. (2014). Mediatization and political agenda-setting: changing issue priorities?. 200-222. doi: 10.1057/9781137275844_11
Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Pangan dan Pertanian, Data dan Informasi Pangan, (Jakarta: PDIKPP, 2022)
R. Rachma, Analisis Framing Berita tentang Kebijakan Pemerintah di Media Online (Jurnal Komunikasi, 2018), 10(1)
R. Rahmawati, Analisis Insentif Ekonomi dalam Kebijakan Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 2020), 17(1)
R. Rahmawati, Analisis Koordinasi Antarlembaga dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 2020), 17(1)
R. Widyastuti, Analisis Infrastruktur Logistik dalam Rantai Pasok (Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 2020), 20(1)
R. Widyastuti, Analisis Kebijakan Subsidi Biodiesel dan Dampaknya terhadap Produksi Minyak Goreng di Indonesia (Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 2019), 19(1)
R. Widyastuti, Analisis Pengawasan dalam Manajemen Rantai Pasok (Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 2020), 20(1)
RM. Entman, Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm (Journal of Communication, 1993), 43(4)
Samuel, Bowles., Sandra, Polania-Reyes. (2012). Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements?. doi: 10.1257/jel.50.2.368
Seeger et al., Leadership in Times of Crisis: The Example of Ebola Virus Disease in Africa (Journal: Global Health Governance, 2016)
Siping, Li., Yaoming, Zhou. (2024). Integrating equity and efficiency into urban logistics resilience under emergency lockdowns. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103446
Sithileuxay, Vatsalaphone. Research on Public Political Trust in Public Crisis Management in Laos. Open Journal of Social Sciences, doi: 10.4236/jss.2024.123006
T. Besley, & M. Ghatak, Retailing Public Goods: The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility (Journal of Public Economics, 2007), 91(9)
World Bank, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020)
